Which licence should be preferred for documentation?

Blender documentation projects, tutorials, translation, learning & teaching Blender

Moderators: jesterKing, stiv

inka
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 3:16 pm
Location: Germany

Which licence should be preferred for documentation?

Postby inka » Sun Feb 09, 2003 1:19 pm

I've read a little discussion on the FDL, which says it might not be the best, because of complexity and saying nothing about possible content like files (pictures, sound, *.blend). Which other licences are possible or is thougt about?

Thanx,
Ingo

matt_e
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 4:32 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Postby matt_e » Mon Feb 10, 2003 2:22 am

Quoted from the official documentation project here:
http://download.blender.org/documentati ... enses.html

The Documentation Licenses
Open Content License

This is the Licence for This Style Guide as well as for the whole Blender Core Documentation. You are kindly requested to produce any contribution to the Blender Documentation Project by using this License. If your contribution is outside Core documentation (as a tutorial, demo .blend file, images or animation) and you wish to use a more restrictive License you can use the the Section called Blender Artistic License.

inka
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 3:16 pm
Location: Germany

Postby inka » Wed Feb 19, 2003 4:37 pm

Thank-you. At the moment it seems that the Blender Artistic License might be the right one: http://download.blender.org/documentati ... s_bal.html . I will see.

Ingo


Return to “Documentation & Education”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests