Previous Thread  Next Thread

chat icon Which licence should be preferred for documentation?

inka

Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2003 1:19 pm
Joined: 17 Oct 2002
Posts: 6
I've read a little discussion on the FDL, which says it might not be the best, because of complexity and saying nothing about possible content like files (pictures, sound, *.blend). Which other licences are possible or is thougt about?

Thanx,
Ingo
Reply with quote


matt_e

Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2003 2:22 am
Joined: 14 Oct 2002
Posts: 897
Quoted from the official documentation project here:
http://download.blender.org/documentation/html/appendix_licenses.html

Quote:
The Documentation Licenses
Open Content License

This is the Licence for This Style Guide as well as for the whole Blender Core Documentation. You are kindly requested to produce any contribution to the Blender Documentation Project by using this License. If your contribution is outside Core documentation (as a tutorial, demo .blend file, images or animation) and you wish to use a more restrictive License you can use the the Section called Blender Artistic License.
Reply with quote


inka

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2003 4:37 pm
Joined: 17 Oct 2002
Posts: 6
Thank-you. At the moment it seems that the Blender Artistic License might be the right one: http://download.blender.org/documentation/html/appendix_licenses_bal.html . I will see.

Ingo
Reply with quote


 
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group