Blender.org

I think he meant in python.....

I have to say no way to changing the behaviour of ctrl == snap to the other way around. It is important I think to have consistancy within the application, and most places now use ctrl == snap.

Man, that didn't come out right, but I hope my point is made (-;

Blender has never been adware supported. Where did you download that version from which created that problem?

http://blender.org/cms/Blender.31.0.html

is the place to download blender from, and it definately doesn't have adware!

I got so worried about the changes to MMB actions that I went ahead and downloaded one of the testing builds, and due to the wasy I work it seems to act excactly the same as before (I start a mouse gesture grab along the axis that I want to constrain to, and then click MMB to contrain that way - wor...

not illegal sadly

However it probably is illegal to use some of those images on that page without the artists permission. Someone might be able to go after him from that angle

In my opinion it's a violation. In no place I see the name "Blender" (he writes "3d rendering prof."), nor I see any mention to it being open source software, no links to gpl or lgpl (sorry don't remember exactly which one). However, under the terms of the GPL and trademark stuff, none of this matt...

To me, the interface is one of the very BEST parts of blender. One of the main reasons for this is the way that all three mousr buttons are used to the full extent of thier ability. With the left hand over g/r/s/shift/ctrl/alt/e/etc and the right hand on the mouse, all the basic operations can be ac...

I was investigating this at one stage, and it appears that for this to happen, the renderer would need to be de-integrated. I read on elysiun the other day something about ton and someone maybe doing this in the near future? But anyway, in the meantime, it is an extrodinarily difficult task, basical...

However, I can see places where hard edges could be used where smoothing goups just wouldn't work.... Isn't life complicated /-:

Thinking of animations (like always...): How does the internal renderer handle the picture-data anyway? Does it compute different passes (specular, color, diffuse) and compose them into the final image? If so it should be feasable to create multiple passes without taking additional rendering-time. ...

Maybe the foundation could create an alphamasked "Made with [blenderlogo]" for people to scroll up the screen at the end(or show on screen in openingcredits), similar to the dolby logo that normally goes up right at the end of a movie. Maybe b&w and colour versions could be created.

wow, thanks for that... All the other IDEs I can get running say "This function is not currently working" when you try to use them dirrectly from CVS

Alt in blender is generally [do-the-opposite], maybe ctrl or something would be better suited. I personally think that brokens proposal is perfect as-is, but yeah, the alternative keystoke idea is also good.

Using the Zbuffer to blur is not a very good DOF. This is because a good DOF should only take objects in the same depth into the blur. So if there is a blue pole in front of white wall, the blur of the wall should take whats behind the pole into the white blur. But most zbuf routines blur the blue ...

Sorry if I'm way off base here, but I've always imagined that with the zbuffer and the gaussian blur now included, DOF would be a simple matter of blurring more and more, the furthar from the focal point in the zbuffer you are. Granted that this wouldn't give a physically accurate model, but surely ...