Blender.org

Hm dunno if there's a faster builtin way (other than using select loose operator), but should work: import bpy, bmesh for ob in bpy.context.scene.objects: if ob.type != 'MESH': continue bm = bmesh.new() bm.from_object(ob, bpy.context.scene) if len(bm.faces) > 0 and 0 not in (len(e.link_faces) for e ...

hm maybe you actually mean to analyse these two cases?



For the left cube, test should return True, for the right (no faces) False?

Here's a cube mesh added with low level api, should have better performance than the operator: import bpy from bpy_extras.io_utils import unpack_list, unpack_face_list coords = ( (-1.0, -1.0, -1.0), (-1.0, 1.0, -1.0), (1.0, 1.0, -1.0), (1.0, -1.0, -1.0), (-1.0, -1.0, 1.0), (-1.0, 1.0, 1.0), (1.0, 1....

verts and edges are NOT faces, polygons are (triangles, quads and ngons).

Face access goes via .polygons


See my addon, it counts tris, quads and ngons separately:

https://svn.blender.org/svnroot/bf-exte ... _select.py

really dunno what you mean, a polygon is a face and vice versa. What's your definition of face? A triangle? A quad? Both of them, so everything which isn't an Ngon?

well, if you append/link an object from another .blend, it won't look at the scene settings (=metrics). It's arguable if it should respect the metric settings of another .blend.

I suggest you never change the scene scale, but scale down your 1 cm cube to 0.01 units (1 unit = 1 m = 100 cm)

you might need to apply transformation > scale before saving your first cube

you could try the knife project tool

does that actually work? I tried it, and it created the file with desired extension, but the content wasn't in the right format. save_render() doesn't render btw., it means it uses some of the scene render settings to store the output! If you set the render settings to TIFF, you can save an image as...

hey travnick, sorry for the late reply, but i couldn't remember where i saw your post. I tested this working: import bpy img = bpy.data.images[0] filepath = r"C:\tmp\_exported_image.tif" def find_color_mode(image): if not isinstance(image, bpy.types.Image): raise(TypeError) else: if image.depth <= 8...

I would go with COLLADA for several reasons:
- it supports armatures
- has native blender support (IO coded in C/C++)
- is an open standard

You could also try FBX, specs are available on the net. It's often used for content IO, but available libraries may not be open source.

maybe subdivide the face area and use a displacement modifier to get more details into it?

Or edge split individually and give it more detail manually.

see http://www.blender.org/documentation/bl ... don-simple

for got to say:
you can select an interaction preset in the splash screen (Blender, Maya, 3ds Max)

You can actually bind hotkeys for toggle manipulators, and for switching which are shown. It's not possbile directly via rightclick however. See http://cgcookie.com/blender/2010/05/17/custom-hot-keys/ http://www.blenderartist.org/forum/showthread.php?291296-Manipulator-Hotkey In user prefs > input, ...