Why not have SIGGRAPH twice a year..

General discussion about the development of the open source Blender

Moderators: jesterKing, stiv

Post Reply
bfvietnam
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 8:54 pm

Why not have SIGGRAPH twice a year..

Post by bfvietnam » Tue Jul 27, 2004 8:26 pm

Then we would get two major revisions of blender a year.
However I guess the conference would become less significant..

Ha!

z3r0_d
Posts: 289
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2002 2:38 am
Contact:

Re: Why not have SIGGRAPH twice a year..

Post by z3r0_d » Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:43 pm

bfvietnam wrote:Then we would get two major revisions of blender a year.
However I guess the conference would become less significant..

Ha!
isn't it already less significant than it was before?

bfvietnam
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 8:54 pm

Re: Why not have SIGGRAPH twice a year..

Post by bfvietnam » Wed Jul 28, 2004 2:28 am

z3r0_d wrote:
bfvietnam wrote:Then we would get two major revisions of blender a year.
However I guess the conference would become less significant..

Ha!
isn't it already less significant than it was before?
True.. Maybe having it twice a year could make it more significant,
particularly if there were more major releases of blender..

xype
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 10:36 pm

Post by xype » Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:14 pm

I doubt it's Blender releases that make SIGGRAPH significant or not. :?

Pablosbrain
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 7:39 pm

Post by Pablosbrain » Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:21 pm

Siggraph is hardly influenced by Blender.
Siggraph will happen with or without Blender.. and has for many many years. I'm glad to see Blender growing and hopefully eventually it will have its own booth again as it did several years back before it was OpenSource.
Have fun those of you going to siggraph! I still can't get the time to go! Hopefully next year!

Post Reply