You mean that bothers you. You have no right to speak for other people. The man just posted a link fully describing what was there.You know, it's not so much the nude part that bothers people as the erotic part.
If it is against your convictions why did you click the link to this thread and possibly his site? You were under no compulsion to do so, you had a choice, to click or not to click. Since you had a choice there can be only one reason you wish to have his post removed and that is to try to impose your convictions on others. I agree that if he had posted the material directly, it should be removed, you wouldn't have had the ability to choose.
Again, no one was forcing you to participate in the discussion -- Why not walk away rather than impose your will on others? Does the mere existence of the topic header disturb you or is it the fact that other people might have access bother you?So please, discuss this somewhere else.
NaeTG, when was the last time you went to an art gallery? The above statement is utter rubbish. Through out history there has been erotic art. Greek statues, Renaissance nudes galore. What about movies? Don't you consider them an art form?While nudity is generally accepted in an artistic community, "erotic" art is not.
I have 3 children (8 - 12 years old) and frankly after visiting the above site I'm far more likely to censor them from some of the violent Saturday morning cartoons.